It’s really not that surprising, but health insurance customers on our state’s Obamacare exchange may be in for some sticker shock soon.
Insurers are submitting their rate proposals for next year. According to the Seattle Times, premiums will rise by an average of 13.5% based on the plans customers now purchase:
Health insurers in Washington are requesting a sharp jump in rates for individual plans next year — up 13.5 percent, on average — and fewer options will be offered through the state-run insurance exchange, officials announced Monday.
It may seem like beating a dead horse at this point, but it bears repeating: Obamacare is a long way off from delivering the $2,500 savings for a family of four that President Obama promised in 2008. It was a ridiculous claim then, and it’s been exposed as pie in the sky.
The premium hikes aren’t hard to understand. Insurers are losing money because exchange plans have been most attractive to less healthy customers. As the AP put it, “The health law’s nagging problems center on lower-than-hoped-for enrollment [and] sicker-than-expected customers…”
Nationally, UnitedHealth announced it was largely pulling out of Obamacare’s exchanges, while an analysis for the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association concluded that members were struggling because they “gained a sicker, more expensive patient population as a result of the law.” UnitedHealth’s pullout included Washington, and Moda has also left our market.
Insurers won’t stay in the market for the privilege of losing money. Premera, which is seeking a 20% rate increase next year, told the Times it lost $117 million last year. It took in $412 million in premiums and paid out $457 million in claims.
The law’s enthusiasts are happy to dismiss such anxieties in ways that miss the point. State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler said, “The requested rate changes are not a surprise, as we expected insurers to make adjustments based on their earlier predictions compared to who actually signed up and what services they used.”
“Who actually signed up” might be a way of saying, “Not the younger, healthier customers we were hoping would pay into the system and underutilize it.”
The federal government’s spokesman emphasized subsidies: “Tax credits that subsidize plans within the exchange rise with premiums, which may insulate 70 percent of Washington consumers from any increase, noted Jonathan Gold, a spokesman for U.S. Health and Human Services.”
That may insulate select customers from the sticker shock, but as premiums rise, the subsidies are getting heftier. That is causing Obamacare’s price tag to balloon, at a time when additional pressures are being put on Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security.
Much like the $2,500 promise, the estimates about Obamacare’s effect on the federal government’s deficit and debt are being missed by a mile. Just add it to the list of broken promises for this underwhelming law.
Latest posts by Rob McKenna (see all)
- Here’s a thought: Open up secret negotiations and legislators’ records - April 21, 2017
- Coming soon? Gas tax info, right at the pump - April 19, 2017
- We’ll have to force government to be more transparent - April 15, 2017