Dave Ross: “But then [less wealthy school districts] would get more money for their schools, presumably, than they’re getting now.”
Rob McKenna: “Right. Relying on local school districts for basic education costs, like teacher salaries, is exactly what the state constitution is designed to avoid. Because that inevitably creates inequities, where people who happen to live in poorer school districts are taxed more heavily and often can’t afford the higher taxes, so they don’t spend as much money from local levies as the wealthier school districts will do.
“Which means, the quality of your education depends in part on where you live and that, again, is what the constitution was trying to prevent in making public education the paramount duty of the state.”
Latest posts by SGW (see all)
- McKenna on KIRO: Odors that violate your property rights - April 20, 2017
- McKenna on KIRO: New law lets A.G. target higher drug prices - April 13, 2017
- McKenna on KIRO: Bertha emerges, but what about cost overruns? - April 7, 2017