Repeal and replace? GOP has intriguing health care plan

Speaker Paul Ryan released House Republicans’ health care plan yesterday. That in itself is a good thing. The new plan is part of the better.gop website I mentioned a few weeks back.

Just as important as the details of the plan is the fact that it actually now exists. House Republicans have passed bills to repeal Obamacare repeatedly but lacked a cohesive plan of their own to get behind. “Repeal and replace” was the rallying cry, but the question remained: replace with what?

Known for being a policy wonk, Ryan stepped into the void and exhibited leadership to get his caucus to coalesce around a plan. Included are popular provisions from Obamacare that give access to those with pre-existing conditions and allow young people to stay on their parents’ plans to age 26. The alternative plan would be a political non-starter without these.

Health care is a distorted market
Some might complain that the GOP’s health care plan is pretty familiar territory, but there’s no need for anything revolutionary. Moving toward a more rational, transparent market for health care would make a world of difference.

One aspect that will look very familiar is the emphasis on the tax-preferred health savings accounts. Encouraging cash transactions for routine medical care will spur competition and lower costs. Relying on the insurance middleman for even basic services has disconnected both patients and providers from hard-nosed concerns about costs, adding to medical inflation.

Tax credit vs. subsidies
Less familiar as a Republican position is Ryan’s call for a cap on the deductibility of premiums. It’s an acknowledgement that tax policy has real-world consequences. Tax preferences favor some uses of money over others. The preference for health insurance premiums is one factor in workers’ compensation mixes growing in health benefits but not salaries in recent years.

For those purchasing their own health insurance, Ryan’s plan offers a universal tax credit instead of Obamacare’s subsidies. That may sounds like essentially the same thing, but in actual practice they’re quite different – and it is a conservative idea.

Ryan didn’t shy away from more controversial – but necessary – provisions, like slowly raising the eligibility age for Medicare to 67, which matches Social Security. This won’t be popular, of course, but the long-term math on Social Security and Medicare is challenging enough. Slowly shifting eligibility ages will prolong these programs and help lower the deficit.

Ryan’s plan hits a number of important touchstones, including block grants to states for Medicaid and capping non-economic damages for medical liability suits. But more than anything, the plan’s specificity and just the fact that it exists is a big step forward for Congressional Republicans. Replace with what? This.
-Rob McKenna

The following two tabs change content below.
Rob McKenna
Rob served two terms as Washington’s Attorney General, from 2005 to 2013. He successfully argued three cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and negotiated three of the largest consumer financial protection settlements in national history, all involving mortgage lending and servicing. He is a recognized leader in the development of consumer protections on the internet, in data protection and privacy regulation.